<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend Wrap-Up April 3rd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theboxingmagazine.com/2010/04/07/weekend-wrap-up-april-3rd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theboxingmagazine.com/2010/04/07/weekend-wrap-up-april-3rd/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://theboxingmagazine.com/2010/04/07/weekend-wrap-up-april-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theboxingmagazine.com/?p=509#comment-161</guid>
		<description>As time goes on, I&#039;m more and more in favor of adjusting certain fighter ratings (of current, active fighters) to reflect the most realistic (at least from the vantage point of the trained eye)match-up scenario possible between particular fighters.

It&#039;s basically what you&#039;ve already said, Don. If something looks obviously wrong with a ratings differential between to fighters, it&#039;s probably best to make the adjustment.

The statistical probabilities that play out as a result should be much more accurate.

The one factor I was recently talking with someone about is the height factor. Some fighters really struggle with taller opponents - even if their skill level is somewhat lower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As time goes on, I&#8217;m more and more in favor of adjusting certain fighter ratings (of current, active fighters) to reflect the most realistic (at least from the vantage point of the trained eye)match-up scenario possible between particular fighters.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically what you&#8217;ve already said, Don. If something looks obviously wrong with a ratings differential between to fighters, it&#8217;s probably best to make the adjustment.</p>
<p>The statistical probabilities that play out as a result should be much more accurate.</p>
<p>The one factor I was recently talking with someone about is the height factor. Some fighters really struggle with taller opponents &#8211; even if their skill level is somewhat lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://theboxingmagazine.com/2010/04/07/weekend-wrap-up-april-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theboxingmagazine.com/?p=509#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Announced this week was Timothy Bradley would be facing Marcos Maidana, a sweet pairing. The only TB question I have is with Maidana&#039;s CF ratings. Extremely high: 11/12. The rest I like. A low PL, hard hitting puncher- always a great TB attraction. Could the 11/12 be a touch too generous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Announced this week was Timothy Bradley would be facing Marcos Maidana, a sweet pairing. The only TB question I have is with Maidana&#8217;s CF ratings. Extremely high: 11/12. The rest I like. A low PL, hard hitting puncher- always a great TB attraction. Could the 11/12 be a touch too generous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

